The frequency of hands-on practical work is declining
Donate Join us

The frequency of hands-on practical work is declining

In this year's Science Teaching Survey we asked respondents about hands-on practical work and the assessment of practical skills.

Download the 2026 dataset
digital illustration of chemistry equipment

Our most important findings:

In most nations the frequency of practical work has decreased, with inequitable opportunities for learners

Compared with 2025, the proportion of respondents saying that they carry out hands-on practical work at least once per week has fallen across all age groups. Scotland was the only nation where the proportion of respondents reporting weekly practicals increased across all age groups from 2025 to 2026.

Our results also show that teachers are more likely to do hands-on practical work at least once per week with younger students than with their exam classes.

Allow cookies to view content.

Scotland stands out as having the highest proportion (74%) of teachers at state funded schools who said they did hands-on practical work at least once a week with their younger secondary school pupils. In Wales and England the proportion was 28% and 26%, respectively. (Figures for NI and RoI are too low for reliable comparison). Teachers in Scotland were also more likely to report doing a teacher demonstration at least once per week.

Allow cookies to view content.

Respondents from schools with more than 30% free school meals (FSM) reported carrying out hands-on practical work and teacher demonstrations less frequently than respondents from schools with less than 30% FSM.

Allow cookies to view content.

Allow cookies to view content.

The Science Teaching Survey 2026 Dataset

Explore in more detail with our dataset that is available as a PDF download.

Download the 2026 dataset
a close up of bubbles

Majority of teachers would like to keep the current approach to assessing practical skills and understanding, with some changes

'Required' or 'core' practicals, or practical assessment groups (PAGs) (depending on exam board) in England are a prescribed list of specific experiments or skills, set by exam boards, that are required to be delivered to learners and assessed through questions in terminal written exams. 

60% of respondents in England want to retain the current ‘required practical’ system of indirectly assessing practical skills and knowledge.

Allow cookies to view content.

Open text responses suggest that many feel it is a preferable approach to previously used modes of assessment such as controlled assessment/coursework, as in their view coursework was less equitable and could be ‘gamed’.

Many argue that without this requirement of completing a set list of practical activities, it would be unlikely that any practical work is done in lessons at all.

If practicals were not termed 'required', cash-strapped headteachers could well say 'do it in groups of four, not pairs', just show a video with an AI-generated worksheet, just do a demo. Also, engagement of borderline students (those whose overall school attendance is low-ish, or who are on the grade 3-4 boundary) is improved with the possibility of practical work.

Head of science, England

Several teachers in England suggest that the 'required' or core practicals assessed at GCSE are often the only practical experiences they can give their learners.

Allow cookies to view content.

However, many would like to see the specified practical activities reviewed, changed or perhaps even reduced in number. Some would welcome the introduction of a form of practical exam or practical endorsement, although they recognise potential logistical issues with using these methods with large cohorts at GCSE.

I think some of the practicals at the moment are of limited value, and the way they are assessed are pointless. I think it would be better to focus on skills and bring back the practical science aspect.

Science teacher, England

I think the reintroduction of practical coursework - or even a practical exam (written) based on key practicals would be good - but some of the required practicals are dull as dishwater and the questions about them in the exams are getting silly in terms of trying to ask new questions about the same practical - and therefore making them harder or less accessible.

Assistant head teacher, England

Teachers would value further professional development on practical science

Teachers reported greatest interest in professional development that would directly support classroom practice and learner assessment.

Practical chemistry was the most highly valued professional development topic among the options presented. Several teachers are seeking ideas for practical activities to help inspire their learners, but there is a strong thread throughout the responses suggesting that teachers want to ensure they are preparing their learners for the assessment of practical skills and knowledge.

Allow cookies to view content.

What we're doing

Discover our resources

The Science Teaching Survey 2026 Dataset

Explore in more detail with our dataset that is available as a PDF download.

Download the 2026 dataset
a close up of bubbles

Related headlines from previous years

In previous years we’ve asked about the barriers to providing practical work. See headlines from 2022, 2023 and 2025 below.

All 2026 headline findings